[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AFRO-NETS> Interview with Stephen Lewis, UN Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa
- Subject: AFRO-NETS> Interview with Stephen Lewis, UN Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa
- From: Dieter Neuvians MD <neuvians@mweb.co.za>
- Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 01:27:41 -0500 (EST)
Interview with Stephen Lewis, UN Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: IRIN <IRIN@irinnews.org>
JOHANNESBURG, 29 November (PLUSNEWS) - Stephen Lewis is the UN Secre-
tary-General's Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa. He spoke to
PlusNews about the crippling impact of HIV/AIDS on women and the "hu-
man rights violations" of people living with HIV/AIDS.
QUESTION: Why is stigma and discrimination still a problem, what is
it that people are afraid of?
ANSWER: Because AIDS is essentially a matter of sexuality, a matter
of sexual intimacy, because AIDS results in such terrifying and gro-
tesque death and because families fall apart, [because] everyone who
comes in contact with AIDS thinks its a death warrant. AIDS remains a
stigma even in the countries which are most beset by the pandemic and
have the highest prevalence rates. I remember meeting just three or
four weeks ago with a dozen women in Arusha, Tanzania, and they were
all living with AIDS and I said to them, "this is unusual, you're all
living with AIDS you're meeting with me here in this little community
centre, what is the reaction of the people in your own communities".
And they looked at me as though I was crazy, and they said, "nobody
in our communities knows we're living with AIDS, only in Arusha, in
an urban centre are we prepared to say we're living with AIDS, where
people don't know us. Where people know us we'll be subject to rejec-
tion, exclusion ostracism, there's no way our families will deal with
us, they'll throw us out, we'll be isolated and alone so we just
don't tell anybody except where its safe", and its safe in an urban
setting, and that is increasingly true right across the continent,
its true everywhere.
Overcoming the stigma and the discrimination against people living
with AIDS is one of the chief ways of being able to respond ade-
quately to the pandemic, because the stigma and discrimination are
paralysing, they prevent programmes from taking place, they prevent
issues from being discussed openly, they prevent open talk of sexual-
ity. One must remember that it's only a couple of years ago now that
a women in South Africa, who said publically she had AIDS, was stoned
to death. These horrendous things happen and people living with AIDS
know.
Q: Twenty years after AIDS was first diagnosed it's still not treated
like any other disease...
A: Its absolutely not treated like any other disease and people liv-
ing with AIDS are subject to a great deal of discrimination, and the
relationship between AIDS and human rights is hardly yet established,
whereas any other communicable disease and human rights is very much
established. We prevent people with AIDS from maintaining employment,
we discriminate against their children in school, we don't give them
the medicines they should be entitled to as a matter of right. The
levels of discrimination against people living with AIDS are almost
enough to fill a catalogue of human rights violations.
Q: Even in UN reports on HIV/AIDS, they still include classifications
of people - intravenous drug users, high-risk groups - but we are yet
to see AIDS as a holistic problem that affects us all. Is that a fair
assessment?
A: Well I think we're much more holistic now than we were, and I
think the tendency to classify and segment is less obvious now than
it was. But its very interesting, what's been true of AIDS for some
time as it unfolds, comes to light always very late. We've known for
years now that AIDS was disproportionately striking women in Africa,
and young women in particular. But it's only in the last year we've
begun to focus in on the fact we were annihilating a gender, that we
were depopulating a continent, in parts, of its women. We've know for
some time that AIDS in combination with a given sector could result
in a dreadful collapse in that sector. It's only now, with the hu-
manitarian crisis and the famine in Southern Africa, that we're fi-
nally linking AIDS and agriculture in that kind of apocalyptic sense
that everyone intuited years ago might come, but wasn't prepared to
confront. Where will it happen next, in education, in areas of con-
flict, in refugee camps? I think it should be possible now to learn
from what we know, and think through the implications. What happens
in a community where your women are reduced catastrophically in num-
bers? What happens to the children, what happens to the new families
that emerge that haven't had skills in love and affection and nurtur-
ing. What happens to your agricultural workers when women do 60 to 80
percent of the productive agricultural work, what are the implica-
tions for what we are seeing? It's not merely overcoming the segmen-
tation of groups, in China it's caused by the contamination of blood
supplies, in Russia its caused by intravenous drug use, in Latin
America it's mostly men having sex with men, in Africa it's hetero-
sexual sex. After you've finished these classifications, we must now
surely understand that everything is linked, and no society with even
a modest prevalence rate can escape the hugely damaging impact of
AIDS.
Q: Access to antiretrovirals is still so far from the realities of
most people, is it a problem in your mind that we keep focussing on
pills as a cure-all when there are also issues of poverty that need
to be addressed in terms of care and treatment?
A: I've never regarded antiretroviral treatment as a cure-all, I per-
sonally have regarded it as a way of prolonging the lives of millions
of people and I think that's a pretty darn good objective, as well as
providing hope in prevention campaigns - it's the kind of hope that
says if you happen to be infected, there are ways of keeping you
alive. It restores a sense in the community that they have to deal
with the pandemic, but it's quite clear that we don't have the money
for antiretroviral drugs, and therefore questions of access are theo-
retical anyway, they're purely hypothetical. What kind of access can
you have when you don't have the drugs? It's something we're going to
have to overcome, we're trying, the UN has said three million people
in treatment by the year 2005, that obviously means well over two
million in Africa, that obviously means every country will have some
component of people in treatment. The World Health Organisation said
it, they don't say things in a cavalier way, one assumes that they
meant it. So it may be that the "pills" as you say, will ultimately
have an impact, but I don't think you can face the pandemic without
dealing equally with care, prevention and treatment. I think you have
to deal with all three.
Q: Turning to Southern Africa and the link between food insecurity
and AIDS, and the deeper structural problem of poverty, you need such
a broad-ranging response where do you begin? Is the recognition there
of the need for a multisectoral approach?
A: No, I don't know if the recognition is there. I know that when we
started responding to the pandemic we all responded to it as a health
issue. Gradually, over the last two or three years in particular,
there has been an increasing multisectoral response, and the national
AIDS councils, national AIDS commissions, have programmes in place -
three year plans, five year plans - which say all the sectors have to
be involved. I think the nexus, the dreadful combination of AIDS and
famine, will serve, if I can use the phrase, as a wake up call, as a
recognition to the rest of the world that AIDS in combination with
any sector can lead to its ultimate collapse, and that we're dealing
with something so different from what we've ever dealt with before.
Isn't that the truth that's now emerging? That the impact of AIDS is
so monumental on societies as a whole, and on communities and fami-
lies in particular, that there is no precedent in human history, that
there's nothing, from the Black Death [a European plague in the four-
teenth century] to the world wars of the twentieth century, that even
approximates it. That we've never had such numbers, we've never seen
the focus on a gender, we've never had so many orphans, we've never
had so many societal breakdowns in various sectors, that what's hap-
pening here is just an overwhelming concatenation [linkage] of
events, of which there are no modern parallels, and therefore we have
to respond in ways that are unprecedented.
--
See also the articles in the IRIN World AIDS Day web special:
http://www.irinnews.org/webspecials/aids/ illustrating that fear is
at the heart of much of the stigma and discrimination that surrounds
HIV and AIDS: fear of death, fear of the unknown, fear of rejection,
and, as Eric Nachibanga, an HIV-positive Zambian points out, "fear of
helplessness".
[This Item is Delivered to the English Service of the UN's IRIN hu-
manitarian information unit, but may not necessarily reflect the
views of the United Nations. For further information, free subscrip-
tions, or to change your keywords, contact e-mail: Irin@ocha.unon.org
or Web: http://www.irinnews.org . If you re-print, copy, archive or
re-post this item, please retain this credit and disclaimer. Repost-
ing by commercial sites requires written IRIN permission.]
Copyright © UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs
2002
--
To send a message to AFRO-NETS, write to: afro-nets@usa.healthnet.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe, write to: majordomo@usa.healthnet.org
in the body of the message type: subscribe afro-nets OR unsubscribe afro-nets
To contact a person, send a message to: afro-nets-help@usa.healthnet.org
Information and archives: http://www.afronets.org
|