[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[afro-nets] March 8: International Women's Day
- From: Leela McCullough <leela@healthnet.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:55:57 -0500
March 8: International Women's Day
----------------------------------
From our ProCOR discussion group
From: "Coleman, Catherine" <CCOLEMAN5@partners.org>
To: <procor@healthnet.org>
Subject: [ProCOR] March 8: International Women's Day
Today is International Women's Day. Thank you to Sara Sanchez,
International Project Leader, Health Professionals against To-
bacco, Sweden for forwarding this article to Globalink's Women
and Tobacco electronic bulletin board (to join:
http://join.globalink.org/)
Women and Tobacco For women, half is the battle
Sydney Morning Herald
c2005
There is not one country where women are truly equal with men,
reports Cosima Marriner on International Women's Day.
Women have made great strides in recent years - increasing their
numbers in parliaments, gaining on men in the pay stakes and be-
coming more educated. The last big international study of gender
equality, Progress of the World's Women, issued by the United
Nations in 2002, found advances around the world, although the
pace of change was too slow in many regions, especially sub-
Saharan African countries struggling with poverty, conflict and
the effects of HIV/AIDS.
Where are the best - and worst - places for women to live? The
answer is not as obvious as it may seem. Despite their problems,
at least 13 countries in sub-Saharan Africa have higher rates of
women's parliamentary participation than countries such as
France, Japan and the United States, the UN notes.
Few countries shine on many levels and in some categories there
are surprising standouts, including Rwanda and Kenya. Nordic
countries such as Sweden, Finland and Norway come closest to fe-
male nirvana when judged by political representation, wages,
health and family-friendly policies.
The worst countries for women to live in - by our standards at
least - are likely to be poor and war-torn, or unsympathetic to
women's rights, such as Saudi Arabia. But finding the faultlines
is not as simple as plotting the borders between East and West.
The chasm between the haves and have-nots makes the US "shock-
ing" for many women, says a University of Adelaide academic,
Barbara Pocock. Low minimum wages (about $A6.50 an hour compared
with $12.30 an hour in Australia), a welfare system aimed at
pushing people back into work, expensive health care and the
dominance of individual bargaining means many women are left on
the outer.
In Australia, women are generally well educated and healthy,
their wages are relatively close to men's and they have their
rights enshrined in law. But academics warn the gains of the
1970s and '80s are starting to erode as women struggle to bal-
ance work and family.
"We certainly have more [Australian] women in positions of power
than we had, we have more women earning higher incomes and they
are better educated," says the feminist Eva Cox, a senior lec-
turer in humanities at the University of Technology, Sydney.
"But we haven't changed our work culture nearly enough. On the
numbers game we've done a lot better than we have on the power-
shifting game."
POWER
Rwanda is an unlikely bastion of female empowerment. But with
women occupying 39 of the 80 seats in its national parliament,
the war-torn nation boasts the highest proportion of female
politicians anywhere in the world. Rwanda's gender balanced par-
liament is due to two factors: a 30 per cent quota for women en-
shrined in its constitution and a proportional representation
system for elections.
Quotas and proportional representation are crucial if women are
to increase their numbers in government, says Marian Sawer, pro-
fessor of politics at the Australian National University. Quotas
force parties to stand a certain number of female candidates.
Proportional representation provides an incentive to put forward
a balanced ticket to appeal to a range of voters.
Women in the Nordic countries have benefited from these two
measures, making up 45 per cent of the Swedish parliament, 37.5
per cent in Finland and 36 per cent in Norway, according to the
Interparliamentary Union.
At the other end of the scale are the Gulf states and some Pa-
cific nations. The parliaments of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain
and the United Arab Emirates have no female representatives. Nor
do Tonga, Micronesia, Nauru or the Solomon Islands.
In recent decades Australian women steadily increased their rep-
resentation in Federal Parliament, only to suffer a decline in
last year's election when the proportion of female MPs dipped
from 25.3 per cent to 24.7 per cent. Sawer attributes this to
the Coalition's increasing move to the right, its aversion to
quotas (unlike Labor, which has achieved a 35 per cent quota),
and the adversarial nature of Westminster politics. Sawer be-
lieves quotas are important if the sexes are to be equally rep-
resented.
"It's important to ensure there are a range of perspectives rep-
resented in Parliament ... It also raises the status of women in
society in general," she says.
MONEY
Nowhere on Earth can women expect pay equity, but Kenya comes
closest. Kenyan women earn 10 per cent less than Kenyan men, the
UN's 2004 Human Development Index says.
But this is probably due to the relatively small participation
of women in the formal labour force in Kenya, says Pocock. This
also explains the small wages gaps in Cambodia (where women earn
77 per cent of what men do), Ghana (75 per cent), and Tanzania
(71 per cent).
An effective minimum wage is the key to narrowing the gap, says
Pocock. Sweden has the second best female-to-male wage ratio, at
0.83. Australian women have the seventh smallest wages gap in
the world, earning 71 per cent of the male wage.
The wages gap is widest where pay rates are unregulated, indi-
vidual bargaining rights are minimal and immigrants with little
protection make up a large proportion of workers. This includes
Saudi Arabia, where women earn just 21 per cent of the male
wage, Oman (22 per cent), Belize in Central America (24 per
cent) and Peru (27 per cent).
How much women earn is partly dictated by their education level.
Most countries have now achieved gender equality in secondary
school education, according to the Progress of the World's Women
report.
But in parts of sub-Saharan Africa and Asia there are still far
fewer girls in secondary school than boys. In Niger, Guinea, Mo-
zambique, Burundi and Chad, fewer than 10 per cent of teenage
girls are enrolled in high school.
FAMILY
Many developed countries - including Australia - score poorly on
child care, maternity leave and child benefits for women. A 2004
OECD report found Turkey, Mexico and New Zealand were the only
countries in the developed world with poorer family-friendly
provisions than Australia. Scandinavian mothers receive the most
support.
Australia, New Zealand and the US are among a handful of govern-
ments that do not require women to be paid some form of mater-
nity leave. In countries as diverse as Russia, Colombia, Laos
and Morocco, the government foots the entire bill for three to
six months of maternity leave. In other countries, including
Iraq, Afghanistan and Zimbabwe, employers must pay maternity
leave benefits.
The Howard Government recently introduced lump sum baby care
payment, which will eventually increase to $5000, but this is
not genuine maternity leave, because it is paid to all mothers
regardless of whether they return to work after the birth of
their child or stay at home.
The Sex Discrimination Commissioner, Pru Goward, blames the lack
of maternity leave, affordable child care and flexible work-
places for the slow growth in the number of Australian women in
full-time work. In 1980, 27 per cent of Australian women were in
full-time work. Despite a surge in female university graduates,
that figure has increased only to 31 per cent today.
"Good child care is essential if you're going to increase the
participation of women in the workforce," says Goward. "Women
can't work without feeling confident their children are well
looked after."
HEALTH
So poor is their health that Zambian women can expect to live to
only 32.5 years, Zimbabwean women to 33.5 and Sierra Leonean
women to 35.6, according to the 2004 Human Development Index.
The combined effect of civil wars, HIV/AIDS and extreme poverty
shorten the lives of many African women and contribute to high
maternal mortality rates.
Japanese women are likely to live nearly three times as long as
African women, on average reaching their 85th birthday. Hong
Kong women also live long lives (average age 82.7), as do those
in Sweden (82.5), Australia (82) and Italy (81.9).
Women in disadvantaged social positions are twice as likely to
suffer poor health, says a 2004 World Health Organisation re-
port, because they are likely to be exposed to malnutrition,
poor water supply and sanitation, unsafe sex, tobacco, drug and
alcohol use, dangerous work and pollution.
Health is a key factor in rating women-friendly countries be-
cause it is linked to education, wealth, employment and gender
bias, says Dr Angela Taft, from the Public Health Association of
Australia.
Under the Taliban, women in Afghanistan were not allowed to be
seen with a man who wasn't a family member. As there were no fe-
male doctors, this meant they were unable to seek medical treat-
ment. The suicide rate increased, as did the mortality and mor-
bidity rate. In China and India, where there is cultural prefer-
ence for sons, there are high rates of foeticide and infanti-
cide.
SAFETY
Although the UN rates the mistreatment of women as one of the
three biggest problems hindering development, there is little
internationally comparable data. Results from a UN survey are
expected by the end of the year.
Among developed countries, Australia has a relatively high inci-
dence of sexual assault. One per cent of women in Australia,
Finland and Sweden reported having been sexually assaulted, com-
pared with the 0.6 per cent international average, according to
the UN's International Crime Victims survey 2000. Women in Ja-
pan, Ireland, Poland and Portugal were least likely to have been
sexually assaulted.
But Australian women were less likely to suffer domestic vio-
lence than those in other countries. "Women in our country are
well educated, and the legal system makes physical and sexual
assault crimes," Taft says, noting the laws also need to be
properly implemented.
Eight per cent have been physically assaulted by an intimate
partner, according to the UN, compared with nearly half the
Bangladeshi female population, 34 per cent in Egypt and 29 per
cent in Canada.
Violence against women is rife in countries involved in civil
wars. In Rwanda from April 1994 to April 1995, estimates of the
number of women and girls raped range from 15,700 to more than
250,000, the UN says.
Domestic violence increases in countries at war. Women who live
in male-oriented societies are also more vulnerable. The first
sexual experience of many girls is often unwanted and forced.
Gender mutilation and child marriages are common in some coun-
tries, and hundreds of thousands of girls are bought and sold
into prostitution or sexual slavery every year, according to a
WHO report on violence and health.
"In countries where women are legislatively and culturally infe-
rior, the rate of violence against women is much higher," Taft
says.
Free at last to lead a life of her own "I have my freedom," says
Marie Baby Sapateh when asked what she likes best about living
in Australia. The 36-year-old Sierra Leone native was one of 2
million people - more than a third of the country's population -
forced to flee her homeland in the late 1990s. Sierra Leone was
destroyed by a decade of civil war that came to an end in 2002.
Sapateh escaped to Guinea first before arriving in Australia in
2001 as a refugee. She suffered the full horror of war in Sierra
Leone. Her husband was shot dead in front of her, she was gang-
raped, and two of her children went missing.
"We suffer the worst suffering," Sapateh says of Sierra Leone
women, who have a life expectancy of 45. "They rape women young
and old; they don't ask. They amputate some girls. They ask the
son to rape the mother."
Sapateh has since been reunited with her two children - she de-
clines to speak about the details - and is working as a nursing
assistant and living in Marrickville.
"My life is happy because I am here with my family. We came here
traumatised from war, we were treated badly ... and now we are
free."
In Australia she has access to medical care, government assis-
tance and better wages - and she is free to wear trousers.
"There I eat and sleep, but not like here. Here I have computer,
I have video, I have this, I have that ... I can also look after
my other family back home. When I was there I couldn't give them
five cents. There you are the man's belonging. Here everyone
gets their own share."
--
Contribute to ProCOR's Global Dialogue by replying to this mes-
sage or sending an email to <procor@healthnet.org>.
Engage others in the discussion by forwarding this message to
colleagues.
We welcome new participants! Subscribing is free--simply send an
email to <procor-join@healthnet.org>.
Questions, comments? Send feedback to Catherine Coleman, Editor
in Chief, ProCOR <ccoleman5@partners.org>.
ProCOR (www.procor.org) is a program of the Lown Cardiovascular
Research Foundation. ProCOR's email discussion is hosted by
SATELLIFE (www.healthnet.org), The Global Health Information
Network.
Change subscription options by sending email with 'help' in sub-
ject to <procor-request@healthnet.org>, or by visiting
http://list.healthnet.org/mailman/listinfo/procor
--
Leela McCullough, Ed.D.
Director of Information Services
SATELLIFE
30 California Street, Watertown, MA 02472, USA
Tel: +1-617-926-9400 Fax: +1-617-926-1212
mailto:leela@healthnet.org
http://www.healthnet.org
|